I’ve just posted my first paper on arXiv. Why? Well, all the cool kids are doing it 🙂 But mainly because I’ve thought quite a lot about its subject, I’ve finished the paper, I’m excited about the results, I want to talk about it NOW, not in 6 months or whenever it gets through reviews and possibly (multiple?) rejections. It’s also a field I know others are working in, and by posting to arXiv before it gets published I am ensuring I don’t get scooped. This argument seems odd in the world of biology, where people can hang onto results until papers are accepted for fear someone else is going to copy their experiments, but it’s true. No one can scoop a result published on arXiv, because once the paper is there, the idea is published, albeit in preprint format, with authors and publication date and everything.
There are other arguments for posting on arXiv of course, including making sure work is open access, but as I am submitting to an open access journal, for me it is mainly about immediacy.
One thing I was a little cautious about is that I have now limited my choice of journals, but, it turns out in the world of statistical genetics, not so much. The new open access journals (PLOS, BMC) are happy to publish papers published on a preprint server, Bioinformatics and the OUP journals seem happy enough, and Genome Research has recently changed its policy to accept manuscripts hosted on preprint servers after a discussion on Twitter (well done them). Even Nature Publishing Group is positive, but American Journal of Human Genetics is now out. There’s a more complete list on Wikipedia, but I could see any other obvious targets that are now barred to me. If enough people use arXiv, then it will be in journals’ best interests to change, as they will have to pick from a smaller pool of manuscripts, which seems unlikely to be helpful in maintaining their cherished impact factors.
My posting this paper on arXiv is possible because I’m its only author. I don’t know whether the biologists in my lab would feel comfortable doing this with papers on which they are also authors, I should probably ask them. The work isn’t groundbreaking, but it’s a good contribution (I think!) to the topic of integrating data from different GWAS/eQTL scans. If, by posting it, it gets read by more people, that’s great, and hopefully will help me in any discussions about future papers in my lab.
Update: this preprint got picked up by Haldane’s Sieve, a space for discussion of population and evolutionary genetic preprints. Another good reason to post on arXiv.